People v. Novick

293 A.D.2d 692, 740 N.Y.S.2d 641, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3944
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 2002·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Molea, J.), rendered May 17, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In support of his motion to renew and reargue his application to controvert the search warrant, the defendant failed to make the necessary “substantial preliminary showing” that the search warrant was issued based upon an affidavit containing knowingly or intentionally false statements or material omissions (Franks v Delaware, 438 US 154, 155-156; see People v Alfinito, 16 NY2d 181).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Novick, 293 A.D.2d 692, 740 N.Y.S.2d 641, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 692 (People v. Novick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brois
2023 NY Slip Op 34737(U) (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County, 2023)
People v. Watson
2018 NY Slip Op 5342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. McGeachy
74 A.D.3d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Tordella
37 A.D.3d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Gant
9 Misc. 3d 611 (New York County Courts, 2005)
People v. Novick
3 A.D.3d 541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Adams
2 Misc. 3d 166 (New York County Courts, 2003)