People v. Norton

9 A.D.3d 741, 779 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9913
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 9 A.D.3d 741 (People v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Norton, 9 A.D.3d 741, 779 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a [742]*742judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered June 27, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant, waiving his right to appeal, pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In accordance with the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 9 years.

We are unpersuaded by defendant’s contention that the waiver of the right to appeal is ineffective due to the catch-all provision purporting to waive all appealable matters defendant may have as of right. Although nonwaivable issues are excluded from the scope of the waiver, the remainder of the waiver is valid and enforceable (see People v Wagoner, 6 AD3d 985 [2004]; People v Umber, 2 AD3d 1051, 1052 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 747 [2004]). To that end, defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence is not preserved for our review given the knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Lemons, 6 AD3d 756 [2004]). Were we to consider the merits of the argument, we would find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed despite defendant’s youth and sparse criminal history (see People v Baker, 6 AD3d 751 [2004]; People v Baker, 195 AD2d 700 [1993]). Defendant’s remaining contention has been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, EJ., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Barrales
2020 NY Slip Op 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Gruber
108 A.D.3d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Neal
56 A.D.2d 1211 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Baker
27 A.D.3d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.3d 741, 779 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norton-nyappdiv-2004.