People v. Norton
This text of 726 N.W.2d 414 (People v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clay Gregory NORTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are *415 not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant the application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006)
MARKMAN, J., would grant the application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in People v. Wright, 474 Mich. 1138, 716 N.W.2d 552 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
726 N.W.2d 414, 477 Mich. 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norton-mich-2007.