People v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad

726 F.2d 505
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1984
DocketNo. 84-1600
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 726 F.2d 505 (People v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad, 726 F.2d 505 (9th Cir. 1984).

Opinions

ORDER

Before KENNEDY, PREGERSON and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Appellants’ emergency motion for stay pending appeal is denied.

Appellants have failed to make a showing of probability of success on the merits. The balance of hardship favor the plaintiffs and the public interest supports denial of a stay. The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting a preliminary injunction.

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, would grant the stay and may file a separate dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
726 F.2d 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-northwestern-pacific-railroad-ca9-1984.