People v. Norman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Norman

110 A.D.2d 859, 488 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 A.D.2d 859 (People v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Norman, 110 A.D.2d 859, 488 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

The record adequately supports the determination made after a WadelMapp hearing denying that branch of defendant’s pretrial motion which sought suppression of complainant’s in-court identification of defendant, based upon a sufficient independent basis to identify defendant (see, People v Pleasant, 54 NY2d 972; United States v Crews, 445 US 463). In addition, the hearing [860]*860court properly found that defendant lacked standing to challenge a search of the stolen automobile from which he was taken upon his illegal arrest (People v McCloud, 81 AD2d 645, 646; see also, People v Ponder, 54 NY2d 160; People v Butler, 90 AD2d 797; United States v Salvucci, 448 US 83). Consequently, defendant has failed to show an appropriate ground for reversal of the judgment. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The record adequately supports the determination made after a WadelMapp hearing denying that branch of defendant’s pretrial motion which sought suppression of complainant’s in-court identification of defendant, based upon a sufficient independent basis to identify defendant (see, People v Pleasant, 54 NY2d 972; United States v Crews, 445 US 463). In addition, the hearing [860]*860court properly found that defendant lacked standing to challenge a search of the stolen automobile from which he was taken upon his illegal arrest (People v McCloud, 81 AD2d 645, 646; see also, People v Ponder, 54 NY2d 160; People v Butler, 90 AD2d 797; United States v Salvucci, 448 US 83). Consequently, defendant has failed to show an appropriate ground for reversal of the judgment. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 A.D.2d 859, 488 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norman-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack