People v. Norman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Norman

47 A.D.2d 728, 365 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8983

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 728 (People v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Norman, 47 A.D.2d 728, 365 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered April 6, 1973, convicting defendant after trial by a jury of the crimes of attempted robbery, first and second degrees, and attempted petit larceny, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment not to exceed 10 and 5 years respectively on the attempted robbery counts and unconditional discharge on the attempted petit larceny count, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the latter count, and otherwise affirmed. The dismissed count is a lesser included count in the indictment and conviction of the greater count requires dismissal of the lesser. (See People v. Pyles, 44 A D 2d 784; CPL 300.40, subd. 3, par. [b].) Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered April 6, 1973, convicting defendant after trial by a jury of the crimes of attempted robbery, first and second degrees, and attempted petit larceny, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment not to exceed 10 and 5 years respectively on the attempted robbery counts and unconditional discharge on the attempted petit larceny count, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the latter count, and otherwise affirmed. The dismissed count is a lesser included count in the indictment and conviction of the greater count requires dismissal of the lesser. (See People v. Pyles, 44 A D 2d 784; CPL 300.40, subd. 3, par. [b].) Concur — Markewieh, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 728, 365 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norman-nyappdiv-1975.