People v. Norman

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Norman

192 N.W.2d 531, 35 Mich. App. 417

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9409

StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.W.2d 531 (People v. Norman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Norman, 192 N.W.2d 531, 35 Mich. App. 417 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant seeks appellate relief on the claim that he was deprived of a fair trial because the jury which convicted him was drawn from the same jury box as a jury which was then deliberating on another charge against the defendant.

The record clearly indicates that no jurors sat on both trials, and that the trial judge made adequate provisions to keep the members of the two juries from coming into contact with one another. In addition, the defendant did not object to the jury, and indicated his satisfaction with the jury.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant seeks appellate relief on the claim that he was deprived of a fair trial because the jury which convicted him was drawn from the same jury box as a jury which was then deliberating on another charge against the defendant.

The record clearly indicates that no jurors sat on both trials, and that the trial judge made adequate provisions to keep the members of the two juries from coming into contact with one another. In addition, the defendant did not object to the jury, and indicated his satisfaction with the jury.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.W.2d 531, 35 Mich. App. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norman-michctapp-1971.