People v. Norelius
This text of 140 A.D.3d 799 (People v. Norelius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Lozito, J.), rendered August 16, 2012, convicting him of driving while ability impaired by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (4-a), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the subject mandatory surcharges and fee imposed at sentencing should be waived is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Ruz, 70 NY2d 942, 943 [1988]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Ziolkowski, 9 AD3d 915 [2004]) and, in any event, without merit (see CPL 420.35 [2]; People v Jones, 26 NY3d 730 [2016]; People v Bones, 52 AD3d 522, 523 [2008]; People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391, 392 [2004]; People v Owens, 10 AD3d 619 [2004]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 A.D.3d 799, 30 N.Y.S.3d 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norelius-nyappdiv-2016.