People v. Norberto

2020 NY Slip Op 06554
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 12, 2020
DocketInd. No. 15-00961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06554 (People v. Norberto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Norberto, 2020 NY Slip Op 06554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Norberto (2020 NY Slip Op 06554)
People v Norberto
2020 NY Slip Op 06554
Decided on November 12, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 12, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2016-05730
(Ind. No. 15-00961)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jerson Norberto, appellant.


Marshall L. Goldstein, Brewster, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (William C. Milaccio and Jordan K. Hummel of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Robert A. Neary, J.), rendered March 9, 2016, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel based upon his attorney's failure to advise him of the immigration consequences of his plea cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, and thus, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim in its entirety (see People v Gustavo-Cano, 149 AD3d 1100, 1101).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN, CONNOLLY and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER: Aprilanne Agostino Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Coverdale
2020 NY Slip Op 08075 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 06554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-norberto-nyappdiv-2020.