People v. Nolasco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nolasco

270 A.D.2d 71, 706 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 71 (People v. Nolasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nolasco, 270 A.D.2d 71, 706 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J., at hearing; Denis Boyle, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 30, 1995, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, to four terms of 6 to 18 years and one term of 5 to 15 years, to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant’s current arguments are unpreserved (see, People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029), and we decline to review them in the [72]*72interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the People adduced sufficiently detailed and specific evidence that the informant had a proven record of reliability (see, People v Calise, 256 AD2d 64, lv denied 93 NY2d 851), that, in any event, there was ample corroborative evidence establishing the credibility of the specific information given by the informant, and that a conversation overheard by the informant in which defendant and the codefendant Alberto discussed their commission of the crime established the basis of the informant’s knowledge (see, People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J., at hearing; Denis Boyle, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered November 30, 1995, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, to four terms of 6 to 18 years and one term of 5 to 15 years, to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant’s current arguments are unpreserved (see, People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029), and we decline to review them in the [72]*72interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the People adduced sufficiently detailed and specific evidence that the informant had a proven record of reliability (see, People v Calise, 256 AD2d 64, lv denied 93 NY2d 851), that, in any event, there was ample corroborative evidence establishing the credibility of the specific information given by the informant, and that a conversation overheard by the informant in which defendant and the codefendant Alberto discussed their commission of the crime established the basis of the informant’s knowledge (see, People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 71, 706 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nolasco-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack