People v. Noland
This text of 27 A.D.2d 663 (People v. Noland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered Hay 7, 1965, reversed, on the facts, and new trial ordered. While the general rule is that, when a victim or “ a witness positively identifies a defendant as the man who committed a crime, the weight of the evidence of identification is for the jury unless it is incredible as a matter of law ” (People v. Seppi, 221 N. Y. 62, 68), it is our opinion that the evidence of identification was insufficient to support a finding that the evidence proved defendant to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 A.D.2d 663, 276 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-noland-nyappdiv-1967.