People v. Nolan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nolan

135 A.D.3d 417, 21 N.Y.S.3d 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 2016·No. 5264/10 16536A 175/11 16536·Published

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), rendered on or about June 14, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nunez, J.), rendered on or about June 14, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe and Moskowitz, JJ.

People v. Nolan, 135 A.D.3d 417, 21 N.Y.S.3d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

135 A.D.3d 417 (People v. Nolan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.