People v. Nixon

Illinois Supreme Court

People v. Nixon

45 Ill. 353

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1867

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 Ill. 353 (People v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nixon, 45 Ill. 353 (Ill. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The question upon this record, is, whether the death of the mother abates a bastardy proceeding commenced during her life, under the statute. The Circuit Court so held, but we cannot concur in that opinion. Such a construction is not required by the language of the act, and would defeat its object. The object is, to compel the putative father to secure the public, as well as the mother, against liability for the support of the child, by a proceeding in the name of the people. The mother is not a party to the record, although allowed to control the suit and made liable for the costs, in case the defendant is discharged. The mother not being a party, there is no technical reason for the abatement of the suit, and its prosecution may be more important to the public than if the mother had not died.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment r&óersed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The question upon this record, is, whether the death of the mother abates a bastardy proceeding commenced during her life, under the statute. The Circuit Court so held, but we cannot concur in that opinion. Such a construction is not required by the language of the act, and would defeat its object. The object is, to compel the putative father to secure the public, as well as the mother, against liability for the support of the child, by a proceeding in the name of the people. The mother is not a party to the record, although allowed to control the suit and made liable for the costs, in case the defendant is discharged. The mother not being a party, there is no technical reason for the abatement of the suit, and its prosecution may be more important to the public than if the mother had not died.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment r&óersed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 Ill. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nixon-ill-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack