People v. Nisonoff, Weinstein

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Nisonoff, Weinstein

60 N.E.2d 391, 294 N.Y. 664, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 861

DecidedJanuary 16, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.E.2d 391 (People v. Nisonoff, Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nisonoff, Weinstein, 60 N.E.2d 391, 294 N.Y. 664, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 861 (N.Y. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “A question under the constitution of the United States was presented and necessarily passed upon. The appellant contended that the receipt in evidence of the medical examiner’s report and the testimony as to the cause of death based thereon violated the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held to the contrary.” [See 293 N. Y. 597.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “A question under the constitution of the United States was presented and necessarily passed upon. The appellant contended that the receipt in evidence of the medical examiner’s report and the testimony as to the cause of death based thereon violated the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held to the contrary.” [See 293 N. Y. 597.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.E.2d 391, 294 N.Y. 664, 1945 N.Y. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nisonoff-weinstein-ny-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack