People v. Nieves
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 04426 (People v. Nieves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
People v Nieves (2025 NY Slip Op 04426)
| People v Nieves |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04426 |
| Decided on July 25, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CURRAN, J.P., MONTOUR, OGDEN, DELCONTE, AND KEANE, JJ.
588 KA 23-00064
v
JASON NIEVES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
TINA L. HARTWELL, PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
TODD C. CARVILLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (ROBERT ROSE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered June 26, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon a guilty plea of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [4]). As defendant contends and the People correctly concede, defendant's purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid inasmuch as both the signed written waiver and the oral waiver colloquy mischaracterized the nature of the right to appeal, and therefore we are not precluded from reviewing his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 565-566 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Irwin, 232 AD3d 1251, 1251 [4th Dept 2024]; People v Cossette, 199 AD3d 1397, 1398 [4th Dept 2021], lv denied 37 NY3d 1160 [2022]). Nonetheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We have reviewed defendant's remaining contention and conclude that it does not warrant modification or reversal of the judgment.
Entered: July 25, 2025
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 04426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nieves-nyappdiv-2025.