People v. Nieves

63 A.D.3d 541, 880 N.Y.S.2d 480
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nieves. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 A.D.3d 1285

Opinion

Judgement Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Stolz, J.), rendered June 25, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3Vs to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The prosecutor was not required to provide the grand jury with a circumstantial evidence charge. Even where the evidence is wholly circumstantial, a failure to charge the grand jury on circumstantial evidence does not impair the integrity of the proceeding (see People v Wooten, 283 AD2d 931, 932 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 943 [2001]).

The surcharges and fees were properly imposed (see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45 [2009]). Concur—Andrias, J.P, Catterson, Renwick, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nieves, 63 A.D.3d 541, 880 N.Y.S.2d 480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 541 (People v. Nieves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guerrero
904 N.E.2d 823 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Mower
770 N.E.2d 1005 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Wooten
283 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)