People v. Nieves

259 A.D.2d 302, 684 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2396
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nieves. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 A.D.2d 305

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered August 22, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years concurrent with a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s determination that the race-neutral reason offered by the prosecutor for the peremptory challenge at issue was nonpretextual is supported by the record and entitled to great deference (see, People v Wint, 237 AD2d 195, lv denied 89 NY2d 1103), and we decline to disturb that determination.

The court’s charge, viewed as a whole, conveyed the proper principles concerning the elements of the crimes charged (People v Fields, 87 NY2d 821, 823) and did not serve to remove a factual issue from the jury’s consideration. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nieves, 259 A.D.2d 302, 684 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 302 (People v. Nieves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fields
660 N.E.2d 1134 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Wint
237 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)