People v. Nicholson

265 A.D.2d 825, 696 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9866

This text of 265 A.D.2d 825 (People v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Nicholson, 265 A.D.2d 825, 696 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evi-

[826]*826dence. Although “based on all the credible evidence a different finding would not have been unreasonable” (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), there is no basis to conclude that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded. Great deference must be accorded the finder of fact, who has had the opportunity to hear the testimony and view the demeanor of the witnesses (see, People v Shedrick, 104 AD2d 263, 274, affd 66 NY2d 1015, rearg denied 67 NY2d 758). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Bristol, J. — Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Shedrick
489 N.E.2d 1290 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Shedrick
104 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 825, 696 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nicholson-nyappdiv-1999.