People v. Nichols

163 A.D.2d 589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nichols. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 A.D.2d 129

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered February 23, 1988, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[590]*590Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention with respect to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636) and is, in any event, without merit. The court did not err in imposing a more severe sentence where the promise of a lesser sentence was clearly conditioned on the defendant’s appearance for sentencing on the scheduled date and his cooperation with the Probation Department (see, People v Asencio, 143 AD2d 917). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Balletta and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nichols, 163 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Asencio
143 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)