People v. Nice

2020 NY Slip Op 07797, 134 N.Y.S.3d 900, 189 A.D.3d 2141
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2020
Docket1145 KA 19-02153
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 07797 (People v. Nice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Nice, 2020 NY Slip Op 07797, 134 N.Y.S.3d 900, 189 A.D.3d 2141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Nice (2020 NY Slip Op 07797)
People v Nice
2020 NY Slip Op 07797
Decided on December 23, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

1145 KA 19-02153

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

KIRT D. NICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JAMES M. SPECYAL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY, FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Ronald D. Ploetz, J.), rendered September 3, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal contempt in the second degree, unlawful fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle in the third degree, reckless driving, and petit larceny.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [8]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence is moot inasmuch as he has completed serving his sentence (see People v Mackey, 79 AD3d 1680, 1681 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 860 [2011]; People v Werner, 71 AD3d 1456, 1456-1457 [4th Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 758 [2010]; People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936, 936 [4th Dept 1997]), and we therefore need not reach defendant's contention with respect to the alleged invalidity of the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Seppe, — AD3d &mdash, &mdash, 2020 NY Slip Op 06888, *1 [4th Dept 2020]; People v Bald, 34 AD3d 1362, 1362 [4th Dept 2006]).

Entered: December 23, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Martino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 07797, 134 N.Y.S.3d 900, 189 A.D.3d 2141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nice-nyappdiv-2020.