People v. Nguyen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nguyen

212 A.D.2d 740, 623 N.Y.S.2d 158

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 740 (People v. Nguyen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nguyen, 212 A.D.2d 740, 623 N.Y.S.2d 158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), rendered November 10,1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), and attempted grand larceny in the second degree (five counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was withdrawn on October 26, 1993, and was reinstated improperly by the court is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]).

Further, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s subsequent application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), rendered November 10,1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree (two counts), and attempted grand larceny in the second degree (five counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was withdrawn on October 26, 1993, and was reinstated improperly by the court is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]).

Further, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s subsequent application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 740, 623 N.Y.S.2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nguyen-nyappdiv-1995.