People v. Newton

135 A.D.2d 1115, 523 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52976
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under all of the circumstances, the remark of the complaining witness that she had known that defendant had killed his brother was not so prejudicial as to require a mistrial. This remark was not in response to any question by the prosecutor and the court promptly directed [1116]*1116that it be stricken from the record and gave a strong curative instruction in its charge. Further, there was strong evidence of defendant’s guilt. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Marshall, J. — attempted rape, second degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Newton, 135 A.D.2d 1115, 523 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

135 A.D.2d 1115 (People v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Anderson
160 Misc. 2d 1012 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)