People v. Newsom
This text of 107 A.D.3d 918 (People v. Newsom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J), rendered February 19, 2010, convicting him attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court [919]*919conducted a proper inquiry with respect to new charges against the defendant, before imposing an enhanced sentence (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 713 [1993]). An evidentiary hearing was not required (see People v Albergotti, 17 NY3d 748, 750 [2011]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Jones, 294 AD2d 450 [2002]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Vasquez, 267 AD2d 118 [1999]). Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 A.D.3d 918, 966 N.Y.S.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newsom-nyappdiv-2013.