Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Newsom

People v. Newsom

107 A.D.3d 918, 966 N.Y.S.2d 865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 2013·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J), rendered February 19, 2010, convicting him attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court [919]*919conducted a proper inquiry with respect to new charges against the defendant, before imposing an enhanced sentence (see People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 713 [1993]). An evidentiary hearing was not required (see People v Albergotti, 17 NY3d 748, 750 [2011]). Moreover, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Jones, 294 AD2d 450 [2002]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Vasquez, 267 AD2d 118 [1999]). Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Newsom, 107 A.D.3d 918, 966 N.Y.S.2d 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

107 A.D.3d 918 (People v. Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Albergotti
952 N.E.2d 1010 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Outley
80 N.Y.2d 702 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Vasquez
267 A.D.2d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Jones
294 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)