People v. Newman
This text of 109 A.D.2d 1077 (People v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although we agree that the trial court erred in refusing to allow defense counsel to inquire into whether Miranda warnings had been administered prior to police questioning defendant at the scene of the crime (CPL 60.45, 710.70 [3]; People v Graham, 78 AD2d 831, affd 55 NY2d 144), we find such error to be harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunningham, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.2d 1077, 487 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newman-nyappdiv-1985.