People v. Newman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Newman

178 N.E.2d 434, 10 N.Y.2d 847

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 19, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 N.E.2d 434 (People v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Newman, 178 N.E.2d 434, 10 N.Y.2d 847 (N.Y. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments affirmed upon the ground that we find no abuse of discretion as a matter of law. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse the judgments of conviction and to permit defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty upon the ground that the City Magistrate’s refusal to permit the withdrawal of the plea of guilty constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. I concur in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments affirmed upon the ground that we find no abuse of discretion as a matter of law. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse the judgments of conviction and to permit defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty upon the ground that the City Magistrate’s refusal to permit the withdrawal of the plea of guilty constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law. I concur in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 N.E.2d 434, 10 N.Y.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newman-ny-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack