People v. Newkirk

100 A.D.3d 1504, 953 N.Y.S.2d 801
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 A.D.3d 1504 (People v. Newkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Newkirk, 100 A.D.3d 1504, 953 N.Y.S.2d 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered December 21, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a nonjury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]), defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he possessed the loaded firearm found by the police in the basement of a suspected drug house in which he was located when the police executed a search warrant (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We reject that contention. The evidence at trial established that defendant was the only person in the house when the police entered, and an officer testified that, immediately before the police gained entry, he heard the sounds of someone inside running down and then up the basement stairs. When questioned by the police, defendant admitted that he had purchased the firearm in question, a photograph of which was on the screen saver of defendant’s cell phone, and it was later determined that defendant’s DNA was on the firearm. That evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant possessed the firearm (see § 10.00 [8]; People v Manini, 79 NY2d 561, 573-574 [1992]; People v Sierra, 45 NY2d 56, 59-60 [1978]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. White
49 Misc. 3d 1105 (New York Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 1504, 953 N.Y.S.2d 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newkirk-nyappdiv-2012.