People v. Newcombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Newcombe

16 A.D.2d 669, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 9, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 669 (People v. Newcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Newcombe, 16 A.D.2d 669, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered May 15, 1961, denying his application to dismiss an indictment containing several counts, to which he, on July 22, 1958, had pleaded guilty to attempted grand larceny second degree, in satisfaction of all the counts. Defendant had not been sentenced on his guilty plea, having been in Federal custody at the time set for sentencing and having remained in such custody until the time of the making of this application in November, 1960, and thereafter. He based his application on the claim that he had been deprived of a speedy trial. Order affirmed. Such affirmance is without prejudice, however, to the right of the defendant, if so advised, to renew his claim on any appeal which he may take from the judgment entered after he has been sentenced. Beldock, Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered May 15, 1961, denying his application to dismiss an indictment containing several counts, to which he, on July 22, 1958, had pleaded guilty to attempted grand larceny second degree, in satisfaction of all the counts. Defendant had not been sentenced on his guilty plea, having been in Federal custody at the time set for sentencing and having remained in such custody until the time of the making of this application in November, 1960, and thereafter. He based his application on the claim that he had been deprived of a speedy trial. Order affirmed. Such affirmance is without prejudice, however, to the right of the defendant, if so advised, to renew his claim on any appeal which he may take from the judgment entered after he has been sentenced. Beldock, Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 669, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newcombe-nyappdiv-1962.