People v. Newbould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Newbould

269 A.D.2d 850, 703 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the issue whether two witnesses were accomplices was for the jury. The evidence did not establish conclusively that those witnesses participated in the crimes (see, People v Crutchfield, 134 AD2d 508, 509, lv denied 71 NY2d 894). “[I]f different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the proof regarding complicity, according to the statutory definition, the question should be left to the jury for its determination” (People v Basch, 36 NY2d 154, 157). (Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Punch, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the issue whether two witnesses were accomplices was for the jury. The evidence did not establish conclusively that those witnesses participated in the crimes (see, People v Crutchfield, 134 AD2d 508, 509, lv denied 71 NY2d 894). “[I]f different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the proof regarding complicity, according to the statutory definition, the question should be left to the jury for its determination” (People v Basch, 36 NY2d 154, 157). (Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Punch, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

People v. Newbould, 269 A.D.2d 850, 703 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

269 A.D.2d 850 (People v. Newbould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related