People v. Newbould

269 A.D.2d 850, 703 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 850 (People v. Newbould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Newbould, 269 A.D.2d 850, 703 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly determined that the issue whether two witnesses were accomplices was for the jury. The evidence did not establish conclusively that those witnesses participated in the crimes (see, People v Crutchfield, 134 AD2d 508, 509, lv denied 71 NY2d 894). “[I]f different inferences may reasonably be drawn from the proof regarding complicity, according to the statutory definition, the question should be left to the jury for its determination” (People v Basch, 36 NY2d 154, 157). (Appeal from Judgment of Orleans County Court, Punch, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. O'Donnell
295 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 850, 703 N.Y.S.2d 801, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newbould-nyappdiv-2000.