People v. New York State Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. New York State Board of Parole

55 A.D.2d 940, 391 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 940 (People v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. New York State Board of Parole, 55 A.D.2d 940, 391 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, its decision and order, both dated December 13, 1976, are vacated and recalled and the following substituted decision is rendered: In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 24, 1976, which denied his application for release, remanded him to custody and directed that he be granted a final parole revocation hearing. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that it is directed that the petitioner be restored to parole under the conditions heretofore in effect (see People ex rel. Royster v Bombard, 55 AD2d 940. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the court’s own motion, its decision and order, both dated December 13, 1976, are vacated and recalled and the following substituted decision is rendered: In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated May 24, 1976, which denied his application for release, remanded him to custody and directed that he be granted a final parole revocation hearing. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted to the extent that it is directed that the petitioner be restored to parole under the conditions heretofore in effect (see People ex rel. Royster v Bombard, 55 AD2d 940. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 940, 391 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack