People v. Nettingham
This text of 17 A.D.2d 979 (People v. Nettingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered April 22,1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of (a) possession of a narcotic with intent to sell; and (b) sale of a narcotic (Penal Law, § 1751, subds. 1, 2), and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In the absence of objection on constitutional grounds, or inquiry indicating that the lawfulness of the alleged search and seizure is questioned, the defendant, on an appeal, may not take advantage of the determination in Mapp v. Ohio (367 U. S. 643). (See People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368; People v. Friola, 11 N Y 2d 157; People v. O’Neill, 11 N Y 2d 148.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 A.D.2d 979, 234 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nettingham-nyappdiv-1962.