People v. Nesmith
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered August 5, 2004, convicting defendant of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 and 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
[464]*464The trial court properly charged manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser included offense of murder in the second degree since there was a reasonable view of the evidence that defendant intended to cause serious physical injury as opposed to death (see People v Butler, 57 NY2d 664 [1982], revg on dissenting op of Sandler, J., 86 AD2d 811, 814-815 [1982]). We note that defendant’s conversation with a People’s witness shortly before the incident could be reasonably interpreted as expressing an intent to cause serious injury but not death.
Defendant’s pro se Confrontation Clause argument is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining pro se claims.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
36 A.D.3d 463 (People v. Nesmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.