People v. Nesbit
Opinion
| People v Nesbit |
| 2015 NY Slip Op 05109 |
| Decided on June 16, 2015 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 16, 2015
2327/11 15420 15419
v
Leonard Nesbit, Defendant-Appellant.
Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for respondent.
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered on or about May 23, 2012,
Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,
It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
ENTERED: JUNE 16, 2015
CLERK
Counsel for appellant is referred to
§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate
Division, First Department.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Nesbit (People v. Nesbit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.