People v. Nery

243 A.D.2d 585, 665 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 A.D.2d 585 (People v. Nery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Nery, 243 A.D.2d 585, 665 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Appeal by the de[586]*586fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Roman, J.), rendered October 11, 1995, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant did not preserve for appellate review his claims that the justification defense was not disproven beyond a reasonable doubt and that the complainant’s testimony was incredible as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Torres, 219 AD2d 565; People v Reeder, 209 AD2d 551). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence was also sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the defendant intended to inflict, and that the complainant sustained, serious physical injury (see, Penal Law § 10.00 [10]; People v Wright, 221 AD2d 577; People v Williams, 96 AD2d 740). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his objection to the court’s instructions to the jury concerning the defense of justification, and, in any event, the contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Spells
66 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Smiley
303 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Johnson
302 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D.2d 585, 665 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nery-nyappdiv-1997.