People v. Nentarz
This text of 235 A.D. 660 (People v. Nentarz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal dismissed. The order denying the motion to change the place of trial, in our opinion, is not appealable. (People v. Brindell, 194 App. Div. 776.) But even if it were appealable, the order should stand, for the papers fall far short of showing that a fair and impartial trial of the defendant upon the indictment cannot be had in Monroe county. What the affidavits do show, however, if believed, is an outrageous abuse of the defendant’s rights which, if true, would merit the severest condemnation. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ. [142 Misc. 477.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nentarz-nyappdiv-1932.