People v. Nemer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Nemer

205 A.D.2d 824, 615 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 824 (People v. Nemer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Nemer, 205 A.D.2d 824, 615 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Fromer, J.), rendered March 3, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree and was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 Vs to 25 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree in satisfaction of a three-count indictment and without any agreement as to the sentence to be imposed. Given these facts and the lack of any evidence of extraordinary circumstances meriting a reduction of the sentence, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

[825]*825Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Fromer, J.), rendered March 3, 1989, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree and was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 Vs to 25 years. Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree in satisfaction of a three-count indictment and without any agreement as to the sentence to be imposed. Given these facts and the lack of any evidence of extraordinary circumstances meriting a reduction of the sentence, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

[825]*825Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Casey, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 824, 615 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nemer-nyappdiv-1994.