People v. Nelson
This text of 225 A.D.2d 636 (People v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[637]*637Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the evidence adduced at the Grand Jury, which consisted solely of the testimony of the undercover officer, "did not so clearly support the [agency] defense as to require its submission” to the Grand Jury (People v Valles, 62 NY2d 36, 41; see also, People v Thompson, 174 AD2d 1007; People v Beverly, 148 AD2d 922; cf., People v Jenkins, 157 AD2d 854). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in dismissing the first count of the indictment based on the People’s failure to charge the agency defense, and that count of the indictment must be reinstated. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 636, 639 N.Y.2d 739, 639 N.Y.S.2d 739, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nelson-nyappdiv-1996.