People v. Nelson

222 A.D.2d 614, 636 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the [615]*615defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered December 20, 1993, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record indicates that the police conduct in this case was justified at its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each step in response to the circumstances presented (People v Bianchi, 208 AD2d 551, affd 85 NY2d 1022; People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369; People v Mills, 198 AD2d 236; People v Adams, 123 AD2d 769). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly denied suppression of physical evidence and a statement made by the defendant to law enforcement officials. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nelson, 222 A.D.2d 614, 636 N.Y.S.2d 637, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moyaho
12 A.D.3d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Gladden
267 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. McKnight
245 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)