People v. Neils

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Neils

130 A.D.2d 686, 515 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 686 (People v. Neils) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Neils, 130 A.D.2d 686, 515 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered May 14, 1986, which, after a hearing, found him in violation of probation, and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The legally competent evidence in the record was sufficient to support the court’s determination that the defendant violated the conditions of his probation by possessing firearms and a controlled substance (see, People v Todd D., 100 AD2d 595). The defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL article 330 which was to vacate the finding that the defendant violated his probation was properly denied. The defendant’s remaining [687]*687contentions, including his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive, are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered May 14, 1986, which, after a hearing, found him in violation of probation, and sentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The legally competent evidence in the record was sufficient to support the court’s determination that the defendant violated the conditions of his probation by possessing firearms and a controlled substance (see, People v Todd D., 100 AD2d 595). The defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL article 330 which was to vacate the finding that the defendant violated his probation was properly denied. The defendant’s remaining [687]*687contentions, including his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive, are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 686, 515 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-neils-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack