People v. Negron

309 A.D.2d 535, 765 N.Y.S.2d 494, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Negron. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 A.D.2d 780

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme [536]*536Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered April 2, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and this waiver encompassed his excessive sentence claim (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]). Therefore, defendant “elect [ed] to. foreclose review of [his] negotiated sentence” (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Negron, 309 A.D.2d 535, 765 N.Y.S.2d 494, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

309 A.D.2d 535 (People v. Negron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)