People v. Neely

99 A.D.3d 578, 951 N.Y.2d 876

This text of 99 A.D.3d 578 (People v. Neely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Neely, 99 A.D.3d 578, 951 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of the defendant’s motion (see e.g. People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]). Defendant has demonstrated a “chronic inability to control his behavior while at liberty” (People v Correa, 83 AD3d 555, 556 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 805 [2011]), committing numerous crimes while on parole and even [579]*579while his resentencing application was pending. Concur — Friedman, J.E, Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Correa
83 A.D.3d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.D.3d 578, 951 N.Y.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-neely-nyappdiv-2012.