People v. Neeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Neeley

4 A.D.2d 1019, 169 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3658

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 10, 1957·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The alleged defects in the proceedings before the Magistrate do not affect the validity of the indictment not otherwise challenged. (People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258.) The allegations of incompetence of defendant’s counsel and the claim of fraud in respect of counsel and the District Attorney are conclusory and devoid of factual support and hence cannot justify relief by writ of error coram nobis (People v. Fanning, 300 N. Y. 593; People V. Oddo, 300 N. Y. 649; People v. Moore, 284 App. Div. 925) and, further, the claims alleged are patently incredible. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The alleged defects in the proceedings before the Magistrate do not affect the validity of the indictment not otherwise challenged. (People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258.) The allegations of incompetence of defendant’s counsel and the claim of fraud in respect of counsel and the District Attorney are conclusory and devoid of factual support and hence cannot justify relief by writ of error coram nobis (People v. Fanning, 300 N. Y. 593; People V. Oddo, 300 N. Y. 649; People v. Moore, 284 App. Div. 925) and, further, the claims alleged are patently incredible. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

People v. Neeley, 4 A.D.2d 1019, 169 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

4 A.D.2d 1019 (People v. Neeley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related