People v. Neeley
This text of 4 A.D.2d 1019 (People v. Neeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The alleged defects in the proceedings before the Magistrate do not affect the validity of the indictment not otherwise challenged. (People ex rel. Hirschberg v. Close, 1 N Y 2d 258.) The allegations of incompetence of defendant’s counsel and the claim of fraud in respect of counsel and the District Attorney are conclusory and devoid of factual support and hence cannot justify relief by writ of error coram nobis (People v. Fanning, 300 N. Y. 593; People V. Oddo, 300 N. Y. 649; People v. Moore, 284 App. Div. 925) and, further, the claims alleged are patently incredible. Concur — Botein, J. P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.2d 1019, 169 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-neeley-nyappdiv-1957.