People v. Nealy
This text of 167 N.Y.S.3d 411 (People v. Nealy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Nealy |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 03531 |
| Decided on June 1, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 1, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
REINALDO E. RIVERA
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.
1995-02496
(Ind. No. 86801)
v
William Nealy, appellant.
William Nealy, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se.
Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Jason R. Richards and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 26, 1998 (People v Nealy, 254 AD2d 505), determining an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 2, 1995.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
DUFFY, J.P., IANNACCI, RIVERA and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 N.Y.S.3d 411, 2022 NY Slip Op 03531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nealy-nyappdiv-2022.