People v. Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Neal

191 A.D.2d 256, 595 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2242

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 256 (People v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Neal, 191 A.D.2d 256, 595 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2242 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered August 29, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of six counts of sodomy in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

In the circumstances herein, where the trial court allowed evidence of a relationship between the minor complainant and a male friend of his mother to be presented to the jury, the trial court did not err in its related discretionary ruling precluding introduction of evidence with respect to the alleged sexual aspect of that relationship (CPL 60.42 [5]; People v Halbert, 80 NY2d 865, affg 175 AD2d 88). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered August 29, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of six counts of sodomy in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

In the circumstances herein, where the trial court allowed evidence of a relationship between the minor complainant and a male friend of his mother to be presented to the jury, the trial court did not err in its related discretionary ruling precluding introduction of evidence with respect to the alleged sexual aspect of that relationship (CPL 60.42 [5]; People v Halbert, 80 NY2d 865, affg 175 AD2d 88). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 256, 595 N.Y.S.2d 17, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-neal-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack