People v. Ndiongue

2020 NY Slip Op 05821, 187 A.D.3d 548, 130 N.Y.S.3d 658
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 2020
DocketInd No. 2091/16 Appeal No. 12066 Case No. 2019-4133
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 05821 (People v. Ndiongue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ndiongue, 2020 NY Slip Op 05821, 187 A.D.3d 548, 130 N.Y.S.3d 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Ndiongue (2020 NY Slip Op 05821)
People v Ndiongue
2020 NY Slip Op 05821
Decided on October 15, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 15, 2020
Before: Renwick, J.P., Gesmer, González, Scarpulla, JJ.

Ind No. 2091/16 Appeal No. 12066 Case No. 2019-4133

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Alioune Ndiongue, Defendant-Appellant.


Stephen Chu, Interim Attorney-in-Charge, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Katrina Jean Myers of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Claire E. Nielsen of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham L. Clott, J.), rendered August 10, 2017, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one to three years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-49 [2007]). The evidence supports the jury's conclusion that defendant, a department store employee, used a credit card number without authorization to purchase a gift card in the amount of $2,000. The fact that the jury

acquitted defendant of other charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 15, 2020



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 05821, 187 A.D.3d 548, 130 N.Y.S.3d 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ndiongue-nyappdiv-2020.