People v. Navis
3 Cal. 106
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
Where the admission or confession of a party is resorted to as evidence, it is error to exclude any portion of it made at the same time as the part which is related.
For this reason, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Navis, 3 Cal. 106 (Cal. 1853).
3 Cal. 106 (People v. Navis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Crowl
82 P.2d 507 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Jackson v. State
145 So. 656 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)