People v. Navarro

7 A.D.3d 816, 776 N.Y.S.2d 890

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [817]*817(O’Dwyer, J.), rendered April 18, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (three counts) and robbery in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly found, after a hearing, that the pretrial identification procedures were not unduly suggestive (see People v Bolt, 295 AD2d 357 [2002]; People v Foster, 272 AD2d 410 [2000]; People v Baptiste, 201 AD2d 659 [1994]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Navarro, 7 A.D.3d 816, 776 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 816 (People v. Navarro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baptiste
201 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Foster
272 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Bolt
295 A.D.2d 357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)