People v. Navarro
This text of 251 A.D.2d 353 (People v. Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.), rendered February 20, 1997, convicting him of scheme to defraud in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and petit larceny (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The limited extent to which the confidential informant was allowed to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination herein did not unfairly undermine the defendant’s right to confrontation (see, People v Chin, 67 NY2d 22; People v Brock, 238 AD2d 347). The court therefore properly declined to strike the testimony of this witness.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 353, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-navarro-nyappdiv-1998.