People v. Nathan
This text of 221 A.D.3d 617 (People v. Nathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Nathan |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 05518 |
| Decided on November 1, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 1, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOSEPH J. MALTESE, J.P.
WILLIAM G. FORD
BARRY E. WARHIT
LOURDES M. VENTURA, JJ.
1995-01113
(Ind. No. 84992)
v
Chandran Nathan, appellant.
Chandran Nathan, Stormville, NY, appellant pro se.
Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Tammy J. Smiley and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 20, 1996 (People v Nathan, 224 AD2d 640), determining an appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 4, 1995.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
MALTESE, J.P., FORD, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.3d 617, 197 N.Y.S.3d 341, 2023 NY Slip Op 05518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nathan-nyappdiv-2023.