People v. Nater-Vazquez

94 A.D.3d 1572, 942 N.Y.S.2d 921

This text of 94 A.D.3d 1572 (People v. Nater-Vazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Nater-Vazquez, 94 A.D.3d 1572, 942 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J), entered June 9, 2010. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Defendant contends that County Court erred in agreeing with the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders that an upward departure from the presumptive risk level was warranted inasmuch as the court relied upon factors already taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. That contention is raised for the first time on appeal and thus is not preserved for our review (see People v Staples, 37 AD3d 1099 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 813 [2007]). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit. Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Staples
37 A.D.3d 1099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.3d 1572, 942 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nater-vazquez-nyappdiv-2012.