People v. Natal
This text of 488 N.E.2d 839 (People v. Natal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant was not deprived of effective assistance of counsel under the standards adopted by this court (see, e.g., People v Morris, 64 NY2d 803, affg 100 AD2d 630; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137) and reaffirmed in People v Satterfield (66 NY2d 796 [decided herewith]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 N.E.2d 839, 66 N.Y.2d 802, 497 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-natal-ny-1985.